1-s2.0-S0305748885800888-main.pdf | Marxism

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 2
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report



Views: 5 | Pages: 2

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Related documents
234 REVIEWS to make the scale and orientation of attainable generalization in historical geography a little clearer. University of British Columbia COL~ HARRIS JOHN BRINCKERHOFFJACKSON,Discovering the Vernacular Landscape (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984. Pp. xii+ 165. $16.50) The work of John Brinckerhoff Jackson is both stimulating and disturbing; stimulating because of the insight that he brings
  234 REVIEWS to make the scale and orientation of attainable generalization in historical geography a little clearer. University of ritish Columbia COL~ HARRIS JOHN BRINCKERHOFF JACKSON Discovering the Vernacular Landscape (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984. Pp. xii+ 165. $16.50) The work of John Brinckerhoff Jackson is both stimulating and disturbing; stimulating because of the insight that he brings to the observations and analysis of landscapes, disturbing because the reader feels reproached for not seeing a particular landscape in the way that -Jackson has. Unlike most professional writers on humanized landscapes Jackson attends to the everyday world and provokes us to appreciate it and speculate about it. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape is an excellent compilation of Jackson commen- taries. He defines the vernacular landscape as one where evidences of a political organization of space are largely or entirely absent... By political I mean those spaces and structures designed to impose or preserve a unity and order on the land, or in keeping with a longrange, largescape plan. He goes on to say that in the vernacular landscape, there is a distinct way of defining and handling time and space ... organizing and using spaces in [a] traditional way and living in communities governed by custom, held together by personal relationships . (p. 149-150) It is clear that this kind of landscape is the most attractive to J. B. Jackson, although he gives considerable ink and thought to the political landscape as well in this volume. The chapters on etymology The Word Itself and A Pair of Ideal Landscapes , are classic Jackson in that they explore the complex meanings of landscape terms and their evolution. His love of language and its potential utility in the comprehension of the built environment is supported in part by his opening thoughts in A Pair of Ideal Landscapes : Those of us who undertake to study landscapes in a serious way soon come up against a sobering truth: even the simplest, least interesting landscape often contains elements which we are quite unable to explain, mysteries that fit into no known pattern. But we also eventually learn that every landscape, no matter how exotic, also contains elements which we at once recognize and understand. (p. 11) Words are elements of that understanding, and the development of key words such as forest, wood, silva, road, dwelling, chattel, countryside and even landscape itself are analysed in these chapters. Jackson's current fascinations, the trailer court and the mobile home, are given good treatment in The Movable Dwelling and How It Came to America . The role of the box house is tied to the early--and continued--mobility of Americans. Movement is the subject of one of the closing exhortations in his last chapter: I would like to think that in the future the profession of landscape architecture will expand beyond its present confines ... and involve itself in making mobility orderly and beautiful. This would mean knowing a great deal about land, its uses, its values, and the political and economic and cultural forces affecting its distribution. (p. 155) The focus on movement runs through much of Jackson's writing and in this book he attempts once again to convince specialists in landscape design to give serious attention to the artifacts of a mobile, fickle society. A constant concern of Jackson is to make the vernacular landscape seem worthy of analysis. In a strong piece on The Origin of Parks he demonstrates that while the political landscape of the formal parks set aside by royalty and landlords alike has aesthetic and historical significance for scholars of the past, the real vitality of social groups has been more often expressed in informal gathering spots along rivers, in the woods, at the edge of cultivated land. He asks is it not time that we acknowledged the need for (another kind of park): the ample, unstructured, unbeautiful, multi-purpose  REVIEWS 235 public playground where adolescents can assert themselves and become social beings, defending and serving some youthful concept of community? (p. 130). In all the book is a delight. For new readers of J. B. Jackson, this volume provides a good introduction to his concerns and his craft. For those who know Jackson's work it is a volume to add to that thin segment of one's library that you turn to when a bright, but uninitiated friend asks What is it you geographers do? How could you give over your life to something as mundane as geography? University of California, Los Angeles C. L. SALTER MATTHEW St'RIGGS (Ed), Marx t Perspectives in Archaeology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984. Pp. vii + 158. s Marxism has had relatively little influence on the development of archaeology in the West. Earlier this century V. Gordon Childe brought a broadly Marxist perspective to the study of British and European prehistory, yet while well respected, he had few significant followers. The New Archaeology of the 1960s and 1970s was essentially functionalist and positivist in orientation, and Childe's theoretical contributions were ignored in the fashionable reaction against his modified diffusionist paradigm. This volume appears after Childe's rediscovery and rehabilitation. Yet it contains much that is far removed from the approaches which he articulated. The twelve contributions display considerable diversity of both subject-matter and theoretical orientation. In the Introduction, Matthew Spriggs stresses that the volume is not intended to represent a unified Marxist school of archaeology; he argues that such a project is both impossible and undesirable . Some of the contributions represent Marxist analyses of specific archaeological problems. Others are more philosophical, abstract discussions of the application of Marxist theory to archaeological data, or of the role of ideology in the contemporary practice of archaeology. But it is the diversity of perspective rather than of subject which is most striking. This, in part, is due to the failure of Marx or Engels to provide a comprehensive theoretical account of pre- or non-class societies. The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles , says the Communist Manifesto of 1848. But Engels, in a footnote, qualified this: That is all written history . The consequence, as Antonio Gilman suggests in his stimulating chapter 'Explaining the Upper Palaeolithic Revolution', is that Marxists today must make their own prehistory aided by only the most general guidelines provided by historical materia- lism. The necessary modifications of Marxist theory are both ingenious and varied, so varied in fact that it can sometimes be unclear what is specifically Marxist about a particular contribution. Despite this, however, a certain broad unity of approach is discernible. There is agreement that social structures should be interpreted as dynamic, dialectical systems; that social reality is contradictory reality; and that contradiction and conflicts of interest are major factors in social change in pre-class as in class societies. Several of the contributions also stress the social basis of present knowledge of the past. But in terms of the general development of current archaeological theory, the most significant aspect of this shared orientation is the rejection of crude economic determi- nist, base-superstructure models of society. In 'The Spirit and its Burden'. Susan Kus forcibly presents Marxist approaches as viable alternatives to the economic or technolo- gical determinist perspectives of other theoretical orientations in archaeology. In line with approaches formulated by Marxists in other fields, and in particular anthropology, most contributors emphasize the interpenetration of base and superstructure, and the crucial rather than epiphenomenal role of ideology in social change. On a theoretical level, such departures from simple base-oriented perspectives may be welcome. Unfortunately, when applied to archaeological data, they deny the practical advantages which less sophisticated Marxist approaches appeared to offer. For the
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks