Development Cooperation in Crisis

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 7
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report



Views: 2 | Pages: 7

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Related documents
At a time of great need, aid and other forms of development cooperation are at risk from current global political and economic trends that threaten international development commitments. In November 2016, representatives from donor countries and developing countries will meet at the second High Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) in Nairobi, to discuss ways to support and improve development effectiveness. The results of this summit have the potential to affect millions of lives, for better or worse.
    Development cooperation in crisis Oxfam Policy Brief NOVEMBER 2016  At a time of great need, aid and other forms of development cooperation are at risk. This month, representatives from donor countries and developing countries alike will meet to discuss the way forward. The direction they take has the potential to affect millions of lives, for better or worse. The second High Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC) in Nairobi will bring together countries from all over the globe to deliberate on ways to improve development effectiveness. This time, they meet at a critical moment in the history; when the accomplishment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) needs renewed and energized international effort.   Life-saving aid to poor nations from richer ones has been a key driver of progress in the fight against global poverty. And, more recently, middle-income countries have played a vital role in poverty reduction, as South-South cooperation (SSC) expands its geographical reach and introduces new and diverse forms of development partnerships. Development cooperation has saved the lives of millions of who face a death sentence from HIV/AIDS. Development cooperation has helped tens of millions of children attend school for the first time; the majority of them young girls. It has fed the hungry and sheltered many in the face of terrible disaster and war  1 . Development cooperation also has a pivotal role to play in addressing emerging global challenges: climate change, extreme inequality and the global displacement crisis. As Oxfam, we are proud to have played our small part in these global successes with hundreds of partner organizations over the last seventy years. Despite these successes, we are seeing worrying trends that threaten our global commitments and our ability to tackle the greatest challenges of our time. Economic stagnation, along with the rise of popular nationalism has led to the brutal treatment of those escaping war and poverty. The need to increase development funding to fight global poverty and promote social justice is slowly losing political energy as we lose focus on our shared values of solidarity and internationalism. Sadly, at a time when we have the highest number of refugees since WWII, we are seeing the quantity of aid stagnating and its quality being degraded. Donor countries who once blazed the trail for the kind of aid that can have a lasting impact, are reversing course and are increasingly using it as a tool for their self-interest: to secure business for their own firms, to boost trade agreements, to bribe poor countries to prevent refugees from coming to their shores, and even to cover domestic costs of supporting the refugees who have arrived seeking 1 .       shelter and safety 2    –  funds which are needed, but should not be taken from aid budgets.  The global community is better than this. We have been, we can be, and we must be. Mahatma Gandhi once famously said: “A civilisation is judged by how it treats its weakest members.” We must fight to restore our belief in shared humanity and as a global society.  At the GPEDC meeting in Nairobi, we must clearly reject the trend of degrading development cooperation. We must solidly recommit to the kind of action that the evidence shows works best to save lives and end poverty: aid that supports the development plans of poor country governments; that supports citizens to hold their governments to account; that strengthens governments’ ability to invest in schools, hospitals, the environment and other critical services that help ensure everyone has a chance for a healthy, prosperous future.  The Nairobi meeting offers a chance to start turning this around. To this end we propose a number of concrete steps for the GPEDC and beyond: 1. Support country ownership as the core fundamental principle of development cooperation Whether in North-South (NSC) or South-South (SSC) development cooperation, ownership is about supporting the needs of developing countries to determine their own development paths. Development programs are led and owned by local people and institutions bring both greater impact and sustainability. Empowering all people to have a say in their country’s development is essential, and in particular, empowering women and ensuring women’s leadership, participation, and rights must be at the core of any ownership approach. Over the past decade, based on clear evidence of what works best, donors have pledged to strengthen developing countries’ ownership over their own development strategies by using country systems by default, increasing budget predictability, and doing away with “tied aid’” or aid that comes under the obligation of using goods and services from sources in the donor country. Country-owned aid helps pay for teachers and midwives, and enables governments to plan and manage their way out of poverty. Despite these commitments, donors are moving away from good forms of aid such as general budget support and other ownership-based mechanisms. The latest GPEDC monitoring report bears out this trend. For example, the report states that only 51 percent of aid meant to strengthen governments actually used country systems in 2015. In addition, medium-term predictability of aid is stagnating at 74 percent, and progress in untying aid has stalled since 2010, with donors still formally providing around 20 percent of their aid with ‘strings attached’ 3 . Starting in Nairobi, donors will need to honour longstanding promises to enable the development of national strategies that have been planned, formulated, and discussed by developing country governments, parliamentarians and civil society. This is critical to ensuring development results are sustainable and respond to 2.  3.      citizens’ needs in the fights against poverty, social injustice, climate change and inequality. Oxfam believes that donors can scale up their efforts by using aid as a critical lever in strengthening the “citizen - state compact” which lies at the core of sustainable development, poverty eradication and inequality reduction. This means: 1) helping citizens, particularly women and marginalised groups, actively engage in public decision-making on issues that affect their lives, and 2) supporting governments to become more accountable  –  including through enhanced parliamentary oversight  –   so they’re prepared to plot their   own path to achieving the SDGs. 2. Use development cooperation to enable countries to raise their own revenues to fight poverty and inequality, and counter tax dodging. Many countries around the world will likely be able to achieve the SDGs without a strong aid intervention. They will do so because their governments, supported and pushed by active civil society organizations and civic engagement, are more likely to raise greater tax revenues from the richest in their societies, and invest these resources in pro-poor public services. The poorest governments, those which can neither raise sufficient revenues domestically nor attract private investment, will still need foreign aid to support even basic service provision. For those countries, aid will be a critical resource for supporting their citizens and meeting the SDGs, even as they work to build their potential to generate domestic revenue and grow their economies. That said, if aid can help lay the groundwork for progressive revenue collection and more efficient and accountable service delivery, aid for domestic resource mobilization (DRM) could accelerate the end of extreme poverty.  Aid for DRM is only part of increasing domestic revenues to fight poverty. Tax systems, the budget cycle and public spending are the most visible and tangible expressions of the social contract between people and their governments. Given that public domestic resources make up the bulk of funds developing countries spend on their own development, using development cooperation to leverage those resources is the most important path to achieving the SDGs. To do this, we must counter the tax dodging practices that deprive countries of significant revenue that could otherwise be used to improve things like health, education and gender equality. Illicit financial outflows from Africa alone have increased from $20 billion in 2001 to $60 billion in 2010. And tax avoidance by multinational firms starves developing countries of approximately $100 billion per year; which is more than enough to educate all of the 121 million children currently out of school and to pay for health interventions that would save 4 million children’s lives 4 . Fair and progressive tax systems provide financing for well-functioning states, enable governments to uphold citizens’ rights to basic services and cement the relationship between citizens and their governments. Development cooperation can be a powerful tool to increase domestic resources  –  by enhancing the capacity of 4. Total annual  financing gap  to achieve universal pre-primary, primary and secondary (as per the SDGs) is $39 billion (UNESCO Global Monitoring Report 2016). The total number of children out of primary school is 61 million and lower secondary is 61 million. The cost of the health interventions to save four million lives comes from The World Health Organization, The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health and the University of Washington (2014). Investment Framework for Women’s and Children’s Health in Africa. Geneva, Switzerland. aif_report.pdf?ua=1      national tax administrations, and promoting technically and politically progressive tax reforms - so lon g as these efforts don’t further burden the poor and the revenue gained from them is used to fight poverty and economic and gender inequality. 3. Use development cooperation to help stop the destruction of democracy and the suppression of citizen voice.  The voice of civil society actors is slowly but steadily being cornered and coerced into submission by governments around the world, devaluing democracy with each step. This is happening despite the commitments of countries at the Busan Conference on Aid Effectiveness to protect the space for civil society organizations (CSO) to be development actors in their own right. According to the International Center for Not-for-profit Law (ICNL), more than 156 laws and other restrictions constraining freedoms of association and assembly were reported in 75 countries since 2012. And in a sample of 58 countries reviewed through the GPEDC monitoring process, only one-third (34 percent) experienced an enabling legal and regulatory environment for civil society organization formation, registration and operation. By restricting civic space, governments are effectively silencing dissenting voices and any challenges to their policies, denying their citizens the rights to free speech, expression, and assembly. They are also critically undermining accountability and the fight against corruption. There is a need to urgently increase development cooperation’s utility in protecting and expanding the space for citizens and civil society actors. In alignment with the Civic Space Initiative, we call on all donor and partner countries to commit to protect and enhance the role of civil society and active citizens in policy dialogue and activities such as budget monitoring and social supervision of both public and private sector operations. We also call on the GPEDC to further strengthen its indicator measuring CSO enabling environment. In particular we encourage more independence in the assessment of this indicator, as self-evaluation by governments cannot guarantee a neutral approach on such a sensitive issue. The UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights to Freedom of Assembly and Association could play a key role in overseeing the improvement of the indicator and data collection, and in appointing the appropriate UN agency at the national level to carry out an independent evaluation of the indicator in consultation with civil society and governments. 4. Get the role of the private sector in donor strategies right. Implementation of the SDGs will require significant financing and the private sector will need to play its part. As a result, many traditional donors have steadily increased the use of their official development assistance (ODA) to support private sector contributions to development, through mechanisms like public-private partnerships and blended finance. Other donors assume that market-based solutions to development challenges are effective, efficient, provide value-for-money and have long-term sustainability. And some donors also seem to concentrate on private sector engagement for more self-interested reasons, where developing countries are key markets and investment sites for donor countries’ firms and investors.  However, there is still little evidence on the effectiveness of donor-private sector partnerships and the results they can achieve. There is much less transparency and accountability with these partnerships, and the development finance institutions that donors use often do not meet basic development effectivenesscriteria — particularly
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks