Effectiveness Review: Copperbelt Livelihoods Project, Zambia | Food Security | Empowerment

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 2
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report
Category:

Others

Published:

Views: 0 | Pages: 2

Extension: PDF | Download: 0

Share
Related documents
Description
The Copperbelt Livelihoods Project targeted 1,000 small-scale farmers - of whom 60 per cent were women - living in ten villages in Kitwe district of Zambia’s Copperbelt Province. In addition to empowering women, the project sought to bolster household income and food security, and reduce vulnerability through the provision of agricultural inputs and increasing market access. These full and summary reports document the findings of a quasi-experimental impact evaluation carried out in October 2011.
Transcript
  The Copperbelt Livelihoods Project which was implemented by a local partner, the Sustainable  Agriculture Programme (SAP), targeted 1,000 small-scale farmers (of whom 60% are women) living in ten villages in Kitwe district of Zambia’s Copperbelt Province. In addition to empowering women, the project sought to bolster household income and food security, and reduce vulnerability through the provision of agricultural inputs and increasing market access. The project’s specic activities included: ã Provision of quality seeds and fertilisers ã Support Agricultural Extension Ofcers to provide advice and technical support ã Support the training and construction of improved grain storage facilities ã Support the development of market gardens during the dry season, including provision of inputs and training ã Training in gender issues, such as greater recogntion of women’s roles in the household/community, and encouraging leadership opportunities for women in communities ã Training in health and HIV/AIDS issues ã Training in advocacy and lobbyingThe context in which the project was implemented is plagued by chronic poverty, poor agricultural production, low market access, climatic related shocks, and a high prevalence of HIV and AIDS. Copperbelt Livelihoods Project : Zambia 2011/12 EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW SAMPLE 2011/12: BANGLADESH BOLIVIA COLOMBIA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO ENGLAND ETHIOPIA GEORGIA GUATEMALA HAITI HONDURAS INDONESIA KENYA LIBERIA MALI NICARAGUA NIGER PALESTINE PAKISTAN PHILIPPINES SOMALIA SOUTH AFRICA UGANDA  ZAMBIA ZIMBABWE PROJECT EFFECTIVENESS REVIEWS ‘enhancing effectiveness through evidence-based learning’  Training in gender issues for all community membersImproved recognition of women’s role in household & community affairs Greater involvement of women in community decision makingGreater decision-making and empowerment for womenGreater involvement of women in household decision making   Increased ownership and control over “strategic” assets Figure 1: Theory of change for one of the project’s key women’s empowerment interventions: Photo credit: Emma Walsh/Oxfam  Evaluation Method In October 2011, with the support of an external consultant, a household survey was administered to 173 randomly selected women from the 10 intervention villages, as well as 248 comparison women from neighbouring communities. The survey comprised of questions not only relevant to the global women’s empowerment indicator –‘% of supported women meaningfully involved in household decision making and inuencing affairs at community level’, but also the project’s other intended outcomes. In order to compare ‘like with like’, statistical analysis of the resulting data was undertaken using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression (MVR) to control for observable differences between the intervention and comparison women.The project team commented that effective participation of women in decision making at household and community levels still faces major cultural and traditional challenges. More progress can be seen at community level where women are leaders in groups and development structures, and less at household level where they still remain under patriarchal power. The ndings from the report are being used to review Oxfam’s programme strategies in Zambia to ensure more specic and tangible women’s empowerment interventions are integrated at the design stage. One such specic intervention will involve training women in skills to enable greater assertiveness and condence. Additionally, meas -ures are being put in place to enable better monitoring and evaluation of indicators relating to women’s empowerment. Overall, no statistically signicant difference was identied between the intervention and comparison women for the global women’s empowerment indicator. However, when the two constituent dimensions of this indicator are decomposed, a different picture is revealed. In particular, a statistically signicant difference exists in favour of the intervention women in relation to their perceived ability to inuence how their communities are governed, but with no such difference for their reported involvement in household level decision-making. A mixed picture also emerges for other aspects of women’s empowerment. In particular, the women supported by the project are more likely to own one or more ‘strategic’ asset but, at the same time, demonstrate less self-efcacy. Given that the reviewed project was also focused on bolstering household income and food security, it is also of interest to explore whether it successfully did so. Towards this end, data were collected on household asset ownership and crop production and sales. A statistically signicant difference in favour of the intervention women was only consistently identied for the former measure. Full versions of this report are available on Oxfam’s Policy and Practice website : http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/ For more information, please contact Oxfam’s Programme Performance and Accountability Team  - ppat@oxfam.org.uk Rating key : - Evidence supporting large impact; - Evidence supporting more modest impact; - Evidence of large impact, but only for specic sub-groups/measures; -  Evidence of modest impact, but only for specic sub-groups/measures; - No evidence of impact Results Going forward OutcomeRatingCommentary Outcome 1 – Women’s empowerment (global outcome indicator) No impact overall, but evidence of signicant impact in inuencing affairs at the community level. Outcome 2 – Female as -set ownershipWomen in the intervention village were found more likely to own at least one strategic asset.Outcome 3 – Women’s self efcacy No evidence to suggest that the supported women have greater condence in dealing with a range of difcult situations.Outcome 4 – Increased household wealth Strong evidence of signicant impact in household asset change since the start of the project.Outcome 5 – Increased agricultural productionSome evidence of impact in relation to maize and groundnut production in the intervention community overall.
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks