1

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 3
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Information Report
Category:

Documents

Published:

Views: 14 | Pages: 3

Extension: DOCX | Download: 0

Share
Related documents
Description
y
Transcript
  Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT ManilaFIRST DIVISION A.C. No. 9514 April 10, 2013BERNARD N. JANDOQUIE, Complainant, vs. ATT!. QUIRINO P. RE IA, JR., Responent.R ! S O # T I O N IARAMA, JR., J.: $efo%e us is a complaint &  fo% isba%ment file b' complainant $e%na% N. (ano)uile a*ainst %esponent +tt'. ui%ino P. Revilla, (%.The Facts of the case a%e not ispute. +tt'. Revilla, (%. nota%i-e a complaintaffiavit /  si*ne b' 0ene%aline . $%osas, 0e%i-al'n $%osas Pe%osa an !lme% . +lva%ao. 0ene%aline $%osas is a siste% of 0ei-el 1'na $%osas Revilla, +tt'. Revilla, (%.2s 3ife. (ano)uile complains that +tt'. Revilla, (%. is is)ualifie to pe%fo%m the nota%ial act 4  pe% Section 45 c6, Rule IV of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice 3hich %eas as follo3s9S!C. 4. Dis)ualifications. : + nota%' public is is)ualifie f%om pe%fo%min* a nota%ial act if he9; ; ; ;5c6 is a spouse, commonla3 pa%tne%, ancesto%, escenant, o% %elative b' affinit' o% consan*uinit' of the p%incipal 8  3ithin the fou%th civil e*%ee.(ano)uile also complains that +tt'. Revilla, (%. i not %e)ui%e the th%ee affiants in the complaintaffiavit to sho3 thei% vali ientification ca%s.In his comment <  to the isba%ment complaint, +tt'. Revilla, (%. i not en' but amitte (ano)uile=s mate%ial alle*ations. The issue, acco%in* to +tt'. Revilla, (%., is 3hethe% the sin*le act of nota%i-in* the complaintaffiavit of %elatives 3ithin the fou%th civil e*%ee of affinit' an, at the same time, not %e)ui%in* them to p%esent vali ientification ca%s is a *%oun fo% isba%ment. +tt'. Revilla, (%. submits that his act is not a *%oun fo% isba%ment. 0e also sa's that he acts as counsel of the th%ee affiants> thus, he shoul be consie%e mo%e as counsel than as a nota%' public 3hen he nota%i-e thei% complaintaffiavit. 0e i not %e)ui%e the affiants to p%esent vali ientification ca%s since he ?no3s them pe%sonall'. 0ene%aline $%osas an 0e%i-al'n $%osas Pe%osa a%e siste%sinla3 3hile !lme% +lva%ao is the livein housebo' of the $%osas famil'.Since the facts a%e not conteste, the Cou%t eems it mo%e p%uent to %esolve the case instea of %efe%%in* it to the Inte*%ate $a% of the Philippines fo% investi*ation.  Inee, +tt'. Revilla, (%. violate the is)ualification %ule une% Section 45c6, Rule IV of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice. 1e a*%ee 3ith him, ho3eve%, that his violation is not a sufficient *%oun fo% isba%ment. +tt'. Revilla, (%.=s violation of the afo%esai is)ualification %ule is be'on ispute. +tt'. Revilla, (%. %eail' amitte that he nota%i-e the complaintaffiavit si*ne b' his %elatives 3ithin the fou%th civil e*%ee of affinit'. Section 45c6, Rule IV of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice clea%l' is)ualifies himf%om nota%i-in* the complaintaffiavit, f%om pe%fo%min* the nota%ial act, since t3o of the affiants o% p%incipals a%e his %elatives 3ithin the fou%th civil e*%ee of affinit'. @iven the clea% p%ovision of the is)ualification %ule, it behoove upon +tt'. Revilla, (%. to act 3ith p%uence an %efuse nota%i-in* theocument. 1e cannot a*%ee 3ith his p%oposition that 3e consie% him to have acte mo%e as counsel of the affiants, not as nota%' public, 3hen he nota%i-e the complaintaffiavit. The nota%ial ce%tificate A  at the bottom of the complaintaffiavit sho3s his si*natu%e as a nota%' public, 3ith a nota%ial commission vali until Decembe% 4&, /7&/.0e cannot the%efo%e claim that he si*ne it as counsel of the th%ee affiants.On the secon cha%*e, 3e a*%ee 3ith +tt'. Revilla, (%. that he cannot be hel liable. If the nota%' public ?no3s the affiants pe%sonall', he nee not %e)ui%e them to sho3 thei% vali ientification ca%s.This %ule is suppo%te b' the efinition of a Bu%atB une% Section A, Rule II of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice. + Bu%atB %efe%s to an act in 3hich an iniviual on a sin*le occasion9 5a6 appea%s in pe%son befo%e the nota%' public an p%esents an inst%ument o% ocument> 5b6 is pe%sonall' ?no3n to the nota%' public o% ientifie b' the nota%' public th%ou*h competent evience of ientit'> 5c6 si*ns the inst%ument o% ocument in the p%esence of the nota%'> an 56 ta?es an oath o% affi%mation befo%ethe nota%' public as to such inst%ument o% ocument. In this case, 0ene%aline $%osas is a siste% of  +tt'. Revilla, (%.=s 3ife> 0e%i-al'n $%osas Pe%osa is his 3ife=s siste%inla3> an !lme% +lva%ao is the livein housebo' of the $%osas famil'. +tt'. Revilla, (%. ?no3s the th%ee affiants pe%sonall'. Thus, he 3as ustifie in no lon*e% %e)ui%in* them to sho3 vali ientification ca%s. $ut +tt'. Revilla, (%. is not 3ithout fault fo% failin* to inicate such fact in the Bu%atB of the complaintaffiavit. No statement 3as inclue the%ein that he ?no3s the th%ee affiants pe%sonall'.    et it be imp%esse that +tt'. Revilla, (%. 3as clea%l' is)ualifie to nota%i-e the complaintaffiavit of his %elatives 3ithin the fou%th civil e*%ee of affinit'. 1hile he has a vali efense as to the secon cha%*e, it oes not e;empt him f%om liabilit' fo% violatin* the is)ualification %ule. +s 3e sai, +tt'. Revilla, (%.=s violation of the is)ualification %ule une% Section 45c6, Rule IV of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice is not a sufficient *%oun to isba% him. To ou% min, +tt'. Revilla, (%. i not commit an' eceit, malp%actice, *%oss misconuct o% *%oss immo%al conuct, o% an' othe% se%ious *%oun fo% isba%ment une% Section /, E  Rule &4E of the Rules of Cou%t. 1e %ecall the case of Ma%ia v. Co%te-   3he%e 3e %ep%imane Co%te- an is)ualifie him f%om bein* commissione as nota%' public fo% si; months. 1e 3e%e convince that sai punishment, 3hich is less seve%e than isba%ment, 3oul al%ea' suffice as sanction fo% Co%te-=s violation. In Co%te-, 3e note the p%ohibition in Section /5b6, Rule IV of the /778 Rules on Nota%ial P%actice that a pe%son shall not pe%fo%m a nota%ial act if the pe%son involve as si*nato%' to the inst%ument o% ocument 5&6 is not in the nota%'=s p%esence pe%sonall' at the time of the nota%i-ation an 5/6 is not pe%sonall' ?no3n to thenota%' public o% othe%3ise ientifie b' the nota%' public th%ou*h a competent evience of ientit'. Co%te- ha nota%i-e a special po3e% of atto%ne' 3ithout havin* the alle*e si*nato%ies appea% befo%e him. In imposin* the less seve%e punishment, 3e 3e%e minful that %emoval f%om the $a% shoul not %eall' be ec%ee 3hen an' punishment less seve%e such as %ep%iman, tempo%a%' suspension o% fine 3oul accomplish the en esi%e. 1âwphi1  Consie%in* the attenant ci%cumstances an the sin*le violation committe b' +tt'. Revilla, (%., 3e a%e in a*%eement that a punishment less seve%e than isba%ment 3oul suffice.10!R!FOR!, %esponent +tt'. ui%ino P. Revilla, (%., is R!PRIM+ND!D an DIS#+ IFI!D f%om bein* commissione as a nota%' public, o% f%om pe%fo%min* an' nota%ial act if he is p%esentl' commissione as a nota%' public, fo% a pe%io of th%ee 546 months. +tt'. Revilla, (%. is fu%the% DIR!CT!D to INFORM the Cou%t, th%ou*h an affiavit, once the pe%io of his is)ualification has lapse.SO ORD!R!D.
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks